DECEMBER 5, 2018 — The Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems Association (EGSA) is less than happy with the news that Singapore is to ban the discharge of wash water from open-loop exhaust gas scrubbers in Singapore port waters (see earlier story).
The EGCSA, which represents scrubber manufacturers, says the announcement of the ban “came without prior notice or discussion with the IMO despite the fact that the Singapore MPA is a signatory to MARPOL Annex VI. The MPA provided neither scientific evidence for its decision nor was the industry invited to consultation. If there had been discussion, the Singapore MPA might have realized the high risks to human health resulting from the high toxicity of low sulfur fuels and more toxic distillates if no exhaust gas cleaning systems are used. The many dumbbell low sulfur fuels (0.50%S fuel oils) are also expected to have less complete combustion as the fuel boiling point distribution and that this will also contribute to higher particulate matter discharge and poorer air quality in Singapore.”
Dumbbell fuels are fuels that do not have normal distillation characteristics. They contain larger percentages of low boiling and high boiling hydrocarbons and far less of the middle boiling fractions, raising concerns about complete combustion.
The EGCSA says that “as the pronouncement by the Singapore MPA is likely to have a significant effect on crude carriers operating inert gas plant discharging into Singapore refineries and storage facilities as well as all other vessels visiting Singaporean waters, it is disappointing that the Singapore MPA has been less than open about its plans and has not, as far as we can tell, based its decision on proven scientific findings.
“We would urge the IMO, national governments, port and harbor authorities to base any future decisions relating to the use of marine scrubbers, whether they use open or closed loop systems, on evidence and fact.
“Ships operating an inert gas plant have discharged process water from open loop scrubbers in the port area for over 50 years. No studies have been published that indicate measurable harm to the marine environment. Nor has the operation of open loop scrubbers at numerous facilities on land such as power station shown to be detrimental to waterways or the environment.”
“Port authorities should consider that the ban of open loop marine scrubber operations is likely to promote the use of low sulfur fuel oils using 0.10%S distillate which have been shown to have a significantly higher toxic impact than heavy sulfur fuel oils (HSFO) (see “Health Effects of Shipping Emissions by Joint Mass Spectrometry Centre, Rostock University and Helmholtz Zentrum München study, presented at the Asia Emissions Technology Conference in Singapore in November 2017). There is furthermore evidence from the refining industry and the IMO Secretary General’s Expert Group on sulfur to show that scrubbers emit 3%-5% less CO2 than low sulfur fuels over their lifecycle. A study by the University of Rostock furthermore identifies the exhaust emissions from low sulfur diesel fuels as posing a greater risk to human health than marine exhaust gas scrubbers.
“It is also apparent that in order to address black carbon and other harmful ultrafine particles, the use of exhaust gas after-treatment is going to have to become ubiquitous as long as liquid fossil fuels are the main stay of a ship’s energy. Investing in these technology developments will certainly be hampered by administrations if they act as unreliable stakeholders.
“As the Singapore MPA’s announcement focused on open loop scrubbers, one conclusion that may be drawn is that there is a significant difference between the discharge from an open loop EGCS to the discharge from an EGCS operating in closed loop mode. What is not clear or published by the MPA is their assessment of the differences and consequent measured or predicted environmental impact.
“The EGCSA welcomes dialogue and evaluation based on science and evidence. We encourage all ports to avoid the quick headline which is politically motivated and provides no measurable society benefit and instead to seek dialogue with the industry, conduct thorough investigations into all the available options for meeting the 2020 sulfur cap and to focus on sustainable solutions that will stand the test of time.”