![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
August 25, 2008 Court upholds Jones Act eligibility of tankersIn a decision filed today the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has upheld the United States Coast Guard interpretation of the Jones Act as it relates to the shipbuilding methods employed by Aker Philadelphia Shipyard and General Dynamics NASSCO. The case had been brought by the Metal Trades Department of the AFL-CIO, naming Admiral Thad W. Allen, United States Coast Guard, Thomas L. Willis and the National Vessel Documentation Center as defendants. At issue was the use of foreign-manufactured components and assemblies in the series of Jones Act products tankers under production at the two shipyards. In her opinion, Judge Gene E.K. Pratter, noted that
That decision, given 39 pages later in her opinion, was
You can download the whole 40 pages of the opinion HERE. Aker Philadelphia Shipyard President and CEO, Jim Miller said today: "We wish to reiterate that Aker Philadelphia Shipyard is extremely proud to be building ships in full compliance with the legal requirements for vessels to be operated in the Jones Act trade. We are satisfied with the court's decision and by working closely with our skilled union work force will continue to deliver on our promise to build quality ships for the U.S. market." |
||||