December 3, 2007
More indictments in marine hose price fixing case
An independent consultant and two executives of Dunlop Oil & Marine Ltd., a manufacturer of marine hose located in Grimsby, United Kingdom, were charged today with participating in a conspiracy to rig bids, fix prices and allocate market shares of marine hose sold in the United States, announced the Department of Justice.
A one-count felony charge was filed today in U.S. District Court in Houston, against Peter Whittle, sole proprietor of a consulting business named PW Consulting (Oil & Marine) Ltd., Bryan Allison, managing director of Dunlop Oil & Marine Ltd., and David Brammar, Dunlop's sales and marketing director.
"Breaking up international cartels that harm U.S. consumers and businesses continues to be the Antitrust Division's top law enforcement priority," said Thomas O. Barnett, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department's Antitrust Division. "The Division will continue to work closely with our antitrust colleagues abroad in order to stop individuals from engaging in price fixing and bid rigging."
Marine hose is a flexible rubber hose used to transfer oil between tankers and storage facilities. During the conspiracy, hundreds of millions of dollars worth of marine hose and related products were affected by the cartel worldwide. The victims of this conspiracy include companies involved in the off-shore extraction and/or transportation of petroleum products and the U.S. Department of Defense.
Whittle, Allison and Brammar are charged with participating in the conspiracy from 1999 until May 2007. The Department charged that during the conspiracy Whittle, Allison, Brammar and their co-conspirators:
Discussed the sale of marine hose at meetings, by telephone, fax and e-mail;
Eight foreign executives, including Whittle, Allison and Brammar, were arrested on May 2, 2007 in Houston and San Francisco and charged for their role in the conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition by rigging bids, fixing prices and allocating market shares for sales of marine hose in the United States, following their participation in a cartel meeting in Houston.
Francesco Scaglia and Val M. Northcutt, executives with Manuli Rubber Industries SpA, were indicted in September 2007 in U.S. District Court in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for their roles in the conspiracy. The case has been put on the court's May 2008 trial docket.
Earlier this month, Christian Caleca and Jacques Cognard, executives with Trelleborg Industrie S.A.S., pleaded guilty to charges stemming from their roles in the conspiracy and have agreed to recommended sentences of 14 months each.
In May 2007, two other foreign executives were charged for their involvement in the conspiracy-Vanni Scodeggio, a business unit manager at Parker ITR srl in Italy and Misao Hioki, an executive involved in the sale of marine hose for Bridgestone Corporation in Japan.
Law enforcement agencies from multiple foreign jurisdictions are investigating or assisting in the ongoing matter.
The investigation is being conducted by the Antitrust Division's National Criminal Enforcement Section, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service of the Department of Defense's Office of Inspector General, the U.S. Navy Criminal Investigative Service, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
"Price fixing and bid rigging are serious crimes that drain resources from the Department of Defense (DOD) and the American taxpayer. The Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) takes very seriously all violations of U.S. antitrust laws that affect products and services procured for our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines. DCIS aggressively investigates those who seek to cheat the DOD and the public by conspiring to suppress competition," said Charles W. Beardall, Director, DCIS.
Whittle, Allison and Brammar are each charged with a violation of the Sherman Act which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years imprisonment and a fine of $1 million for individuals. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.